Welcome Back!

You have Gifts for Good in your basket.

Welcome Back!

Last time you were here, you were looking to help vulnerable children and families. Your support can save and change lives.

As a child-centred organisation, ChildFund Laos works especially with children and focuses on the issue of child protection in our work.

While we cannot stop disasters and other risks to children, we can reduce their impact by working in partnership with children and their families in Nonghet, Laos.

ChildFund uses a tool called the Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Analysis method that enables communities to express their perceptions and understanding of hazards affecting them. This in turn informs our development work.

In Nonghet in northern Laos, two of the main risks that children identify in their lives are road safety and dog bites.

With much of the land still littered with unexploded bombs leftover from the Vietnam War, children are often forced to play near the main road, which is the route used by large trucks and buses moving between Laos and Vietnam.

As there are no footpaths, children are also forced to walk on the road to get to school. Mostly by themselves while their parents are busy working in the fields to support their families. The road is narrow and windy, leaving drivers with poor visibility. This combined with excessive speed causes many accidents.

To help reduce this hazard ChildFund working with the local community to devise solutions and is providing children in Nonghet with road safety training.

We believe that children have the right to participate in decisions that affect them so it is vital we always include input from them when designing development programs, but having children sit together to gather information about the risks that they face also has several other benefits.

We find children often have different perceptions of hazards compared to adults, so it is essential that young people are given the opportunity to be actively involved in the creation of their own community disaster risk plans.

Involving children in developing these plans also ensures young people have a greater retention of the knowledge they need to protect themselves against risks and are able to take action in the face of danger.

Using a participatory method also helps to empower young people and build their confidence by teaching them to think critically and actively about their surroundings.

ChildFund Laos believes the right tools are invaluable for helping kids to take steps to reduce the risks they face in their communities every day.

“Some families just have bad luck,” says Mun, 42, as she sits with her husband Siphone, 42, waiting for passing vehicles to purchase gasoline from their shopfront. The gasoline business is a new venture following a cluster bomb accident that devastated their family two years ago.

On that fateful day, Mun’s brother Bounmy, aged 28, was helping to farm the family`s plot when he struck a UXO (unexploded ordnance) that exploded on impact. He died instantly along with one of Siphone and Mun’s daughters, Kingkeo, aged 14. Mun and her sister-in-law were also injured and have shrapnel embedded in their bodies. They cannot afford to have it surgically removed and must live with the pain it causes.

Siphone shows us where the accident occurred. Their farming plot sits at the top of a mountain approximately 400m from their house in Nonghet district, among the peaks of Xieng Khouang province. The family had grown crops there in the past without incident, but the accident has left them scared for their safety.

Even though they are poor, Mun refuses to work in the field since the accident, and two of the couple’s three surviving children have moved to Vientiane to work as cleaners and servers in restaurants out of fear that they will end up being killed like their sister. Phimpha is 12 years old and too young to move away.

Without their crop, the family will not have enough food to eat, so Siphone and Mun have borrowed money to hire people to work in their field. Through these efforts the family has just enough to survive, but it would not suffice if all their children were still living at home.